Uttar Pradesh Imposes Section 144 After Killing of Mafia-Politician and Brother
In the aftermath of the killing of mafia-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed's brother Ashraf Ahmed, and after Atiq Ahmed's son was killed in an encounter, the Uttar Pradesh government has imposed Section 144 of CrPC in all districts. This move comes as the state government aims to maintain law and order and prevent any violent outbreaks.
The events leading up to the imposition of Section 144 began when Atiq Ahmed's son Asad was killed in an encounter in Uttar Pradesh's Jhansi. Atiq Ahmed was a powerful politician in the state, known for his involvement in criminal activities. Despite this, he was elected to the Uttar Pradesh Assembly in 2002 as a member of the Samajwadi Party. He was later expelled from the party in 2017 for allegedly assaulting staff at a prison where he was held.
Following the killing of Atiq Ahmed's son, Ashraf Ahmed and Atiq Ahmed himself were being taken for medical treatment when they were attacked and killed. The killings have raised concerns about the state of law and order in Uttar Pradesh.
The imposition of Section 144 of CrPC is a preventive measure that aims to avoid any further escalation of violence in the state. This section of the Criminal Procedure Code empowers authorities to prohibit the assembly of four or more people in an area. The imposition of this section is often used by state authorities during times of unrest to control the situation and prevent any further violence.
While the imposition of Section 144 is a necessary step to maintain law and order, it is also important to address the root causes of the violence. The involvement of powerful politicians in criminal activities has been a longstanding issue in Uttar Pradesh. These politicians often have large followings and are able to use their power to evade justice.
The killing of Atiq Ahmed's son and brother has once again highlighted the need for the state government to take action against these politicians. The government must ensure that those involved in criminal activities are held accountable, regardless of their political connections.
One possible solution to the problem of politicians with criminal backgrounds is to implement electoral reforms. The Supreme Court of India has previously directed political parties to publish the criminal records of their candidates before elections. However, this directive has not been strictly enforced, and many politicians with criminal backgrounds continue to be elected to public office.
The state government must take a strong stance against these politicians and work to implement meaningful reforms. This could include the introduction of stricter laws to prevent criminals from contesting elections, as well as greater transparency in the political process.
In addition to electoral reforms, the state government must also invest in law enforcement and the judiciary. Police and court systems in Uttar Pradesh have been criticized for being inefficient and corrupt. The government must take steps to address these issues and ensure that criminals are held accountable for their actions.
Ultimately, the imposition of Section 144 is just one step in the process of maintaining law and order in Uttar Pradesh. The state government must take a comprehensive approach to address the root causes of the violence and work towards creating a safer and more just society for all citizens. This will require political will, commitment, and resources, but it is a necessary step if the state is to move towards a brighter future.
0 Comments